Harvey
Administrator
- Joined
- Jul 15, 2020
I think it's pretty likely that "ORDA" doesn't want uphill.
The difference between Whiteface and Gore/Belle is that Whiteface has a long established tradition and culture of uphill. The people/person making the decision probably personally knows the people impacted by the reduction in access. My guess is that there is a feeling that you can't just eliminate uphill at WF.
Let's face it, the reason to allow uphill is to engender good feelings with locals. There's no pure "business" reason to allow it. It's a liability with no real financial upside.
This could be the most stunning position I've ever read in this forum.
The difference between Whiteface and Gore/Belle is that Whiteface has a long established tradition and culture of uphill. The people/person making the decision probably personally knows the people impacted by the reduction in access. My guess is that there is a feeling that you can't just eliminate uphill at WF.
Let's face it, the reason to allow uphill is to engender good feelings with locals. There's no pure "business" reason to allow it. It's a liability with no real financial upside.
So you are old, and you don't care if skiing survives after you are gone?I'd be happy if they priced young families off the mountain
This could be the most stunning position I've ever read in this forum.