No evidence the J&J shot is better/safer (given what we don’t know) than the mRNA vaccines. J&J is not a “traditional” vaccine. While it does incorporate weakened virus, given that it’s a viral vector shot it uses that viral material in a different way than traditional vaccines. Seems that viral vectors use weakened virus not to produce antibodies, but rather it’s used to introduce double stranded genetic code (via Adenovirus 26/HAdv-D26) into human cells. That adenovirus is encoded with DNA instruction for building coronavirus spiked proteins. So, even though it’s different, it acts in a somewhat similar manner to the mRNA vaccines. Or so I’ve read.
Again, not saying any of that is a reason to not take any of the shots, but it’s a fair question what long term effects circumventing our natural immunities via genetic response to this particular Coronavirus may have on our bodies’ abilities to respond to other Coronaviruses, and Coronaviruses are pretty common.
Maybe I ask too many questions, maybe I misunderstand the science...but asking question doesn’t seem imprudent. Being able to talk about it with others who might know more, without being hushed and slammed down as a denier, would seem like a good thing...
Again, not saying any of that is a reason to not take any of the shots, but it’s a fair question what long term effects circumventing our natural immunities via genetic response to this particular Coronavirus may have on our bodies’ abilities to respond to other Coronaviruses, and Coronaviruses are pretty common.
Maybe I ask too many questions, maybe I misunderstand the science...but asking question doesn’t seem imprudent. Being able to talk about it with others who might know more, without being hushed and slammed down as a denier, would seem like a good thing...