I see your point but at least Gore is nearer the path.
Nearer REALLY doesn't count!!!
I guess I have to keep repeating this explanation:
And Harvey staying at his place and seeing a few seconds of solar corona will kick himself for not being willing to drive a trivial distance to Indian Lake where it would be a couple of minutes.----- Original Message -----
From: Jay Pasachoff
To: SEML
Sent: Sunday, November 25, 2012 8:23 AM
Subject: [SEML] Eclipse ratios.
Since the sun is about 400,000 times brighter than the full moon (about 14 magnitudes), a 99% eclipse (so termed) is about 4,000 times too bright compared with totality, which is about the brightness of the full moon. So a "99% eclipse" is really only 100/400,000 = 1/4,000 = 1/40% of totality = 0.025%.
So if someone claims 99% coverage, we can translate to less then a tenth of a percent of the way to totality. 99.9% coverage is two tenths of a percent of the way to totality.
Forbes online seems to understand the situation and is warning people from being suckered into "just outside the path" places like Gore.