Kind of a strange assertion. Would you call a paragraph like this “authoritative”, or would you question whether the author knows what he is talking about?
“Last year’s mediocre winter was due to global warming. This year’s shitty winter was not due to global warming. The year before last was global warming but the year before that year wasn’t global warming”
I wish we could all just agree on a basic story here. Maybe something like:
“Human-caused climate change is real. There will be good years & bad years in the future, due to localized weather phenomena, but the general trend is for warmer temperatures. This greatly affects low elevation skiing in the east, where the difference between a good snowstorm, and a shitty ice/rain event is only a few degrees. Additionally, warmer overall temperatures will increase the likelihood of melting between storms, impacting base depths & hurting off piste skiing. Snowmaking is saving eastern skiing for now, but rising temperatures will also impact snowmaking windows & force resorts to question their snowmaking strategies.”