TheGreatAbyss
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jul 23, 2020
Not at the intensity or time scale that the PNW isNew York City is due for a crushing earthquake
Not at the intensity or time scale that the PNW isNew York City is due for a crushing earthquake
Maybe read the article? It mentions that even a smaller earthquake would do millions of dollars more in damage than in an area that regularly deals with (and designs for) earthquakes.Not at the intensity or time scale that the PNW is
Yup. Gravity is a bitch if ya fall but also allows for fun too. Light from the sun can kill ya too but also supports a lot of forms of life.There was a tornado in Mechanicville when I was younger. The ice storm knocked out power for a bunch of communities for a week or two in ‘98. New York City is due for a crushing earthquake (https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2022/12/05/predicting-the-earthquake-that-could-wreck-new-york). The Yellowstone Supercaldera could explode & destroy global food supplies (https://www.vox.com/2014/9/5/6108169/yellowstone-supervolcano-eruption).
Anyone can point to a bunch of random things and say that the world is a dangerous place. You guys sound like the “Mom Alert” SNL skit:
Yeah I read it, did you read the article I posted? New York might get a 5 on the order of 100s of years, 7 on the order of 1000s, but no one really knows as there is little evidenceMaybe read the article?
How common do you think 9s are?Yeah I read it, did you read the article I posted? New York might get a 5 on the order of 100s of years, 7 on the order of 1000s, but no one really knows as there is little evidence
Seattle is in a major subduction zone, which sees 8 or 9s every several hundred years. The article talks about the ground itself dropping 10s of feet in elevation. Oh, and Seattle only VERY recently started designing with earthquakes in mind. You ever been there? Lots of old concrete towers that will crumble instantly, and 100 year old wood houses that will just tumble off their foundations.
A worse case magnitude 9 is 10,000x more powerful then the 5 NYC might get in the same time frame.
I only ski at resorts, so the backcountry thing isn't a factor for me.Yeah, I think it’s really time for passionate skiers to consider how much longer they want to stay in the east.
I’m usually a “It’s still early”, “Plenty of season left”, “March is historically the snowiest month” guy, but I’m not sure I can count on February/March anymore.
And without February/March, there really is no ski season in the east.
Skiing white ribbons of death with a bunch of drunk/stoned maniacs is not my idea of fun. I do it early in the season to get my legs a workout, but at some point, I really like to get into the trees & BC, away from the masses. Resorts are (correctly) scrambling to reblow the connector trails they lost to the warmth/rain, so it’s hard for them to lay down base on new trails (and get that sweet blowover into the trees). This pattern looks likely to continue for a little while longer.
At least out west, there is plenty of room for the drunk/stoned maniacs to spread out. And honestly, I just wished for snowmaking blowover so that the trees can get a decent base before a 2”-8” storm. I feel like I’m hoping for a little potato chunk in my gruel so I can get a tiny lift of happiness & say “well, it isn’t all terrible!” Pretty pathetic, honestly.
I would say that there are Resorts out west that aren’t like that & resorts in the east (Stowe) that are.The other is the traffic and parking issues plaguing the western resorts in most markets. I was in Utah back in December and the traffic was bad then, but it is even worse now that it's mid-season. Parking lots fill by 9, and it can be impossible on one of the ski buses because they stupidly slashed service in half. And this doesn't even account for paid parking, which is spreading like a virus out there, and can easily cost you more than a season pass over the course of the season. Basically, the skiing might not be that good on certain days in the east, but at least I know I'll be able to actually go when I want to, and not break the bank doing so. I'll fly out west once or twice a year, and set up trips in a way to avoid the traffic problems.
And thats not even getting started with I-70... It's kinda rad that all the "hardcore" outdoor enthusiasts from the east jump ship and move west, it leaves us fools that stay behind with quiet MTB trails, uncrowded BC zones and way less Bro's at the trailhead.All of the Utah cottonwoods resorts are certainly plagued by overcrowding. It's not that bad on the mountain, just the getting to the mountain that's the problem.
Interesting to me. Have you felt this way for a while or is it after your recent trip?There are two things keeping me in the east. One is that all of my family is here, and I don't want to have to fly to visit my parents, because I will probably see them much less often.
The other is the traffic and parking issues plaguing the western resorts in most markets. I was in Utah back in December and the traffic was bad then, but it is even worse now that it's mid-season. Parking lots fill by 9, and it can be impossible to get on one of the ski buses because they stupidly slashed service in half. And this doesn't even account for paid parking, which is spreading like a virus out there, and can easily cost you more than a season pass over the course of the season. Basically, the skiing might not be that good on certain days in the east, but at least I know I'll be able to actually go when I want to, and not break the bank doing so. I'll fly out west once or twice a year, and set up trips in a way to avoid the traffic problems.
It also goes without saying that the west can have bad snow years too. They just happen to be having a really good year right now.