raisingarizona
Well-known member
- Joined
- Aug 4, 2020
Yeah, it seems like a lot of people are skirting the reality of these predictions. I feel the same that if they're close to being correct than there's WAY bigger problems than being able to go skiing.From the article:
I dunno, that seems like a really extreme projection. Perhaps they are assuming all natural snowfall and not accounting for snow making?
There is a massive temperature difference between RI and CT ski areas (which still make it work today) and northern NH, VT, and ME ski areas. Low temps between NoVT to CT in the valleys are often 10+ degrees (and even more variance in the deep winter).
Average temperatures would need to increase big time to make snow making unavailable in northern New England by the end of the century. If temperatures increased that much and that rapidly, skiing would be the least of our concerns, life as we know it on Earth would be in jeopardy.
I can definitely see natural snow viability becoming a big problem in southern and central New England by the end of the century. Heck, it already is an issue, but not causing wide spread failures (yet).
It seems to me that the only areas that could possibly hold viable ski resorts would be the coldest and highest regions so probably the Rocky Mountains. I don't think that either New England or the Sierra Mountains are going to be able to sustain real ski area businesses by the turn of the century. So there will be skiing! But not for most of us. If shit doesn't go full on post apocalyptic Mad Max like then it would only be for those that could afford it and in a country that goes from 523 ski areas down to say.....15 it's going to be expensive, like real freaking expensive.