Safer, no avalanche danger, less technical, wide trails, vs narrow.
The result of grooming and maintenance of the trails.
Toll Road is ... windblown and icy, very few days it is any good.
Another advantage of snowmaking and grooming at WF.
If someone gets hurt in the backcountry there is often significant Search and Rescue.
If you get hurt at WF patrol with a sled can SAR you, which is certainly less costly with the access that has been built there.
Paying for resources: The first skier could pay $10M to use the area and everyone else could be free. It's not that there is no cost, it's more about the difference between fixed and variable cost. Ski areas have a ton of fixed cost, and it only works if you spread it across many.
FWIW I think few (or none) here are against uphill access. Why would you be? IMO it has to be regulated somehow. I'm sure buying a pass indemnifies the mountain from lawsuit if you get killed by a snowmobile. Maybe it is just a few people, but it was my understanding that it started to get much more popular during covid and management felt they had to do something.
This poll was really designed to get opinions on a different issue: Do you think the mountains and venues would be better with private management or ownership?
My opinion is probably pretty well known here. ORDA areas have something that private areas don't have. Not saying it is better or worse, but it's different. Personally I love skiing at a place without slopeside lodging, but that is just me.
I want to see NY continue to look to find ways to support private ski areas too.
How can private business compete with the flow of taxpayer funded grants that go to New York's three state-owned ski areas?
nyskiblog.com
I'll leave this here for now, but ultimately probably move it to the Uphill Thread at some point.