gorgonzola
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jul 21, 2020
The correct term in vail-ese speak is "ancillary attachments”.
The correct term in vail-ese speak is "ancillary attachments”.
This but I will cry when those oil derrick towers are replacedReplace 5 with a fixed grip quad.
Replacing two with a fixed grip quad down to the base would take a lot of pressure off of 1 & 1a. If you walk out of the main lodge you have to take one of those lifts to get anywhere else on the mountain.
A high speed lift is much more complicated than a fixed grip. The technology was relatively new 30 years ago and like anything else, has been improved over the years to be more reliable and less costly to repair. Today's high speed lifts will last much longer than their predecessors.I couldn't locate a digital copy of Chris' article but did find this one from 2015 that places a lifespan of a high-speed quad at 23.8 years. Granted the article is eight years old, but an interesting read.
https://liftblog.com/2015/09/21/the-lifespan-of-a-high-speed-quad/.
I will miss those as well. But a new lift could be installed in a different alignment that would allow Atlas to be reopened past Epicurus all the way down the lift line.This but I will cry when those oil derrick towers are replaced
That was/is such a fun trail. It deserves to be "officially" reopened.I will miss those as well. But a new lift could be installed in a different alignment that would allow Atlas to be reopened past Epicurus all the way down the lift line.
A high speed lift is much more complicated than a fixed grip. The technology was relatively new 30 years ago and like anything else, has been improved over the years to be more reliable and less costly to repair. Today's high speed lifts will last much longer than their predecessors.
How do you make a small fortune in the ski industry?Agree. We've all heard the old adage, "How do you end up with a million dollars in the ski industry?"
Start with $50 million.
And know when to quitStart with a LARGE fortune
As much as I like to dis the Visions Chair, I have to add a dose of reality. If problematic is defined using the metric of average operating hours between shutdown failures, Visions is not even close. Chair 2 is the clear winner. It gets used the least, and when it does there are now immediate problems. 5's next b/c it only gets used for weekends/holidays and there are problems 1-4 times a month. Visions is on every normal day we are open and runs 8-12 hours every day. And Visions issues are mostly loading area related. And while we've had to pony motor folks off Visions this year, we haven't had a lift evac (TFG). Finally, Visions is relatively easy to fix because parts are available. For example Sunday's afternoon shutdown was repaired by Tuesday. Honestly the loading carpet is a PITA, but not even close to total fail. In reality the Visions Chair is far more reliable than anything else on the hill, and it gets far more hours than all the chairs except for Chair 3. Its not even close folks.It's sad when the newest lift on the hill is the most problematic. That coupled with the staffing problems, and the lack of snow, limiting work arounds to lift issues, has been really frustrating this year.
I like the idea of replacing chair 2 and extending it to the base. It would be nice to have a means to escape the base area without schlepping to 3, or relying on often closed connector trails.