I dunno, I’m pretty sure Alpine has its fair share of steep and rowdy.
Listen, I’m no expert on the resort formerly known as SquawAlpine (but I have skied there), nor on terms that came to be commonly used and associated with Indigenous Peoples of North America, or the history of Squaw Valley CA for that matter. That said….
While Alpine Meadows certainly has (had) it’s steep and rowdy, I’m not sure it has (had) it’s fair share, relative to the (formerly) Squaw side of the resort. If they had to make a name change…I agree with not adopting the Alpine Meadows moniker for the whole resort. Alpine is (was) small in relation to the whole resort, and the connotation, to me, just isn’t representative of what the greater Squaw Valley has to offer, skiing-wise.
Is Palisades any better? Maybe. The fortress/wall of granite that has been the Palisades (terrain) IS iconic. However, (thanks Jersey)….it just sounds like a mall to me.
Was a name change necessary? At first blush it reeks of cancel culture to me. I guess if there’s truth to that valley having been called the Squaw Valley because that’s where white men went to get (buy) kidnapped and raped Washoe women….well that would be bad. Or did they name it Squaw Valley because it’s the valley thru which runs Squaw Creek? Chicken, eggs…I don’t, honestly, know. Notwithstanding what may have happened to Washoe women in that valley, I don’t like the general thinking that Squaw, a word most likely derived from the Algonquin word for woman, should now be considered a racial and sexual slur because of its use by white people. That’s not how I ever considered the use of the word, but maybe I just ain’t woke enough….