x10003q
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jul 21, 2020
East coast vertical matters more in east than Rockies/West coast vertical because it truly indicates the size of the mountain. Out West, the acreage matters more than the vertical. East coast acreage is so much smaller than western acerage that the vertical is one of the best ways to indicate the length of the runs.Really somewhat dependent on region and how big the mountains are. Copper has total vert of 2601 and True-Up Vertical Descent of 2410, for a resort in the category 2000-2500 acres. The difference is on the order of 10%. Think anyone cares? What's more interesting is to compare Copper with Keystone. Keystone has more acreage, less True-up Vert, and more total vert. They are both easy driving distance from Dillon, which has good lodging options. If someone has never been to either and is trying to decide where to go, looking up True-up Vert might be worthwhile as another piece of info.
For Massanutten, the difference is 60 ft for 1100 ft vert. Does that really matter from a skiing standpoint? No. But it matters for marketing purposes. At 1100 ft, Massanutten has more vert than any ski area in PA. Using True-Up Vert, Blue Mountain and Blue Knob just beat Massanutten.
You could also say that actual elevation matters. Beech Mountain in NC would not be a ski area if it wasn't at over 5000 ft. Beech is like Plattekill in that total vert and True-up Vert are the same.
Bogus Basin in Idaho (basically a day trip mountain for Boise) is 'only' 1800 vertical, but 2600 acres!! In the east - Killington seems to be the largest at 1509 acres and that might include Pico. Sugarloaf is 1240 acres (610 acres with snowmaking) and a huge chunk is Brackett Basin and Burnt Mountain. Gore is 439 acres.
Vertical matters in the East.