Low Angle Life
Well-known member
- Joined
- Feb 20, 2021
NYS will continue to make investments at Belle, this weekends crowds are a major justification for it, but really why would you invest in a pricey expansion if it also meant having to increase snow making capacity and lift access? Money is better spent continuing to make improvements to the core area before moving out to additional terrain like Highmount. It is a big enough mountain as is to spread the crowds out.It is great to see Plattekill have great success, especially after all the whining about the $74 million NYS never spent (as I predicted) connecting Belleayre to Highmount and adding 2 lifts. FYI - the expansion was finally approved in Dec, 2015, 16 YEARS after the first permit applications. It is now 22 years since permiting started with no sign of a connection. Highmount closed in 1992, right around when Laz bought Plattekill. Laz's grandkids will be running Platty before NYS ever expands Belleayre.
With the lack of snow and my Belle pass, I haven't make it to Platte once this season, I wish that weren't the case but I don't feel I've missed much, honestly I feel I've gotten the better deal. Plattekill needs to expand their snow making if they want to keep up, but I also understand that would also likely mean additional MTN Ops staff. I WOULD choose Plattekill over Belle if they had a similar percentage of terrain open during the low tide times but a season like the one we just had really shows that snow making firepower is THE MOST important investment moving forward, aside from good people that is. I think it also backs Harvey's point that powder hounds are far from essential for running a profitable operation.
Skiing also seems to be at capacity everywhere, there are enough butts for every chair, particularly when talking about that Cats.