TheGreatAbyss
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jul 23, 2020
F Vail
- Thread starter raisingarizona
- Start date
trackbiker
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jul 21, 2020
FYI: Could read it on my phone after google search.
Doesn’t bode well for running lifts midweek or improvements.
Doesn’t bode well for running lifts midweek or improvements.
Ya mean the Q & A with the beanie counters?
Loading…
www.investing.com
They don’t talk about making snow.
Peter Minde
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jul 19, 2020
I tried to read that whole investing.com piece, I really did. It made my head hurt.
WTF is "ancillary capture?"
WTF is "ancillary capture?"
Ripitz
Well-known member
- Joined
- Dec 23, 2020
They spent 15 mil firing people and another 8 mil to ditch the soda queen and bring back Katz.
The company’s fiscal 2025 earnings also included $15.2 million of one-time costs related to the company’s “resource efficiency transformation plan,” along with $8.1 million in one-time costs related to the company’s chief executive officer transition.
The company’s fiscal 2025 earnings also included $15.2 million of one-time costs related to the company’s “resource efficiency transformation plan,” along with $8.1 million in one-time costs related to the company’s chief executive officer transition.
Peter Minde
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jul 19, 2020
How much are they paying the person devising these gobbledygook phrases.
Maybe a dry $25 ripoffburger with a side of parking the car.
Vail to charge maximum $50 per day for skier parking, up from $40 last season
The town of Vail’s winter parking program goes into effect Nov. 14, with the Town Council approving a $10 per hour charge for a maximum of five hours on peak days. That’s up from a...
www.vaildaily.com
Last edited:
Brownski
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jul 19, 2020
Chicken fingers
&
Utah court rules against Park City Mountain in decision that could have national implications
The Utah Court of Appeals ruled against Park City Mountain when it determined the resort's plan to upgrade two lifts in 2022 was not adherent to its development agreement. It also found that the Park City Planning Commission has a right to question a resort's calculations of Comfortable Carrying...www.sltrib.com
With those 2 recent legal losses this week Vail Resorts Inc might just have to up their ancillary attachment$ game.
Vail Resorts’ $21 Million Court Loss Explained (And Why You Should Care) — PeakRankings
Vail Resorts’ biggest public court loss ever decision also has far bigger implications for several other high-profile incidents the company is already facing—plus creates new precedent for the American ski industry as a whole.
www.peakrankings.com
