It's anything good on boilerplate?Okay, Voile lovers, anybody have experience with the Voile Objective. The website says it’s Skimo focused and is at home on boilerplate. Seems like it might be a good Catskills all rounder?
Okay, Voile lovers, anybody have experience with the Voile Objective. The website says it’s Skimo focused and is at home on boilerplate. Seems like it might be a good Catskills all rounder?
I guess it depends on where you plan on going. Would you go with fishscales? What boot and binding would you drive those with?Okay, Voile lovers, anybody have experience with the Voile Objective. The website says it’s Skimo focused and is at home on boilerplate. Seems like it might be a good Catskills all rounder?
I love love love my Objective BC's! At 82 underfoot it is a perfect everyday ski, very light with a tech setup and ideal for trails that are packed in and more than capable to handle up to 6-8" of fresh.I'm thinking of them as lightweight general purpose for cut up east coast snow and trees. I'd love to put lightweight bindings on them but they would likely just get my Guardians transferred over. My boots are Cochise 120s. I am not sure about fish scales; uphilling thus far has been at resorts and NELSAPs but that could change.
IMO those boots and bindings would be overkill for that ski. Kinda like putting monster truck tires on a Prius. Usually if you want to save weight you do it with lighter boots and bindings. The weight of the ski is less of a priority. Lightweight skis like that need appropriate boots and bindings to match. They would be great for touring as SBR mentioned. I run the Ultravectors with fishscales and I love them. They have the same turning radius as the Objectives with more width under foot.I'm thinking of them as lightweight general purpose for cut up east coast snow and trees. I'd love to put lightweight bindings on them but they would likely just get my Guardians transferred over. My boots are Cochise 120s. I am not sure about fish scales; uphilling thus far has been at resorts and NELSAPs but that could change.
IMO those boots and bindings would be overkill for that ski. Kinda like putting monster truck tires on a Prius. Usually if you want to save weight you do it with lighter boots and bindings. The weight of the ski is less of a priority. Lightweight skis like that need appropriate boots and bindings to match. They would be great for touring as SBR mentioned. I run the Ultravectors with fishscales and I love them. They have the same turning radius as the Objectives with more width under foot.