MarzNC
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jul 18, 2020
You would like the trails at Big Sky. Plenty of long, wide groomers without that many people.No but it's on our list of places to visit. We shall see.
I just hope there's enough places for working class people whom are residents--- the actual caretakers of a community so they live comfortably and not in high density employee barracks or living an hour away. But unfortunately that's fleeting as the wealthy and corps monopolize all the land.
Unlike Steamboat or Crested Butte, there wasn't a town at Big Sky before the first ski trails were cut in the 1970s. The original Big Sky terrain didn't include Moonlight Basin or Spanish Peaks. Fair to say that the number of people employed by the resort has grown quite a bit in the last decade. Boyne Resorts has been building employee housing in recent years. Unlike Taos or Telluride, there seems to be land in the valley available. Driving to Big Sky doesn't really require driving a steep mountain road.
The change I noticed as a traveler is that it's easier to fly into Bozeman than ten years ago. Most of my Big Sky trips involve meeting up with my primary ski buddy in SLC. Then we drive via Driggs and ski Grand Targhee for a few days on the way to Montana. I can even fly Southwest to/from Bozeman now, which wasn't an option before.
For sure lodging is more expensive in Big Sky and in Bozeman. The pandemic was a factor, although prices were going up after 2015 or so as demand increased. Ikon and MCP made a difference for travelers from the east and west coasts. Northeast folks with season passes to Loon or Sunday River or Sugarloaf, as well as midwest folks who ski Boyne Mountain or The Highlands get some sort of deal for Big Sky since those resorts are all owned and operated by Boyne Resorts.
Last edited: