After skiing at Gore this past weekend, this quote comes to mind. "Something is rotten in Denmark" I appreciate that the Gore employees are working hard. It was great that the lifts were all spinning and they opened early. But after skiing multiple trails that are advertised as open, and Gore boasting about all of the acres they have covered and finding those trails half covered or worse, the width of two groomer tracks, I think my only choice is to go to WF.
I am not Sno, I do not have massive amounts of data, but the Gore conditions are unacceptable. On Monday, a major holiday for the industry, here was the open trail count at the ORDA mountains:
Gore 57/108 53%
WF 70/96 73%
Bell 60/62. 97%
I skied Gore on Saturday with friends who opted to ski WF on Sunday. They said it was an entirely different experience with trails covered side to side. There was snowmaking underway on multiple trails. I appreciate that the Gore crew needed time off, but how does WF have a more robust snowmaking operation when they have less acreage to cover? How do they have enough snowmakers to keep their operation going through MLK weekend when Gore has to suspend snowmaking over a holiday?
Today, midweek, here is the open trail count for the ORDA mountains:
Gore. 50/108 46%
WF. 69/96. 72%
Bell. 60/62. 97%
How is less than half of the terrain open at Gore when the sister mountains have so much open? Is it Gore management? ORDA? The state has invested so much money in the mountain. I know on this forum, we want to see the mountain thrive. There needs to be accountability for how it is being run. What are our options? Write to ORDA? Attend board meetings? Confer with Gore management?