Sno Train Discussion

snoloco

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 1, 2021
Yes, it's supposed to be Snow Train, but I figured I'd use the first part of my username. Anyways, this thread is to respond to various questions about trains in the other thread, without moving it off topic.

I’ve looked at the Adirondack Express to try to connect to Lake Placid. It was shut down for a while during Covid and then there was some track repair north of Albany. It is now back with daily service to Westport but the shuttle from there is no longer running. Would love to see this service reinstated and promoted to get people up there from the Big Apple.
The shuttle from Westport likely did not work simply due to the travel time, and the indirect route. North of Schenectady, the Adirondack is very slow. Before part of it was ripped up for a bike path, the line from Utica via Old Forge and Tupper Lake was also a long, circuitous route. It would likely be better to have an express bus from Albany or Saratoga.

It is possible to take Metro North or Amtrak to Poughkeepsie and then bus to Belleayre. Ulster County runs a free shuttle to Kingston and then another called the Z route that runs along 28 to Pine Hill with a stop at Belleayre by request. As of right now that route is only Mon-Sat. Once ski season starts there is another route that is usually added called the Belleayre Express that runs on Sundays.

Aside from the Ethan Allen Express, the only other train to ski area option that I’m aware of is the Harlem Valley Line to Thunder Ridge. I’ve heard of a shuttle from the station in Patterson but have yet to see this in action to confirm.

Would love to hear some other connections that can be made that you now of. I’m down for a ski train adventure.
Didn't know about the bus to Belleayre. It's theoretically possible, but not really practical to use it to connect with Metro North. Amtrak's Vermonter passes somewhat near Stowe at Waterbury, and Jay Peak at Saint Albans, but I'm not aware of any local transit connections to those resorts.

Sno, what do you think would be a realistic travel time from Penn to North Creek with the current tracks but no stops? Is there a a realistic theoretical model for a dedicated ski train run by Amtrak or Metro North?
The line from Saratoga to North Creek is 56 miles long. Assuming an average speed of 45 mph with upgraded track, the trip can be made in 1:15. Amtrak currently takes about 55 minutes from Saratoga to Albany, and 2:35 Albany to New York. Adding them up, you get 4:45, but likely closer to 5 hours, since trains have a layover in Albany to change crews. That is including all the usual stops. That's a departure at about 4am for a 9am arrival. Currently, the earliest train heading northbound leaves at 7:15am. I believe construction is usually done at night, so that wouldn't really work. Also, you can't really run a train for primarily overnight guests, as the capacity of one train is likely greater than the bed base in North Creek. The only potential for a train is to run from Albany, via Schenectady and Saratoga. A 6am departure would arrive by 8:10, and a 4:30pm departure from North Creek would arrive back to Albany at 6:40. This essentially mirrors the Winter Park Express in Denver, which is also primarily for day trippers, and it is pretty well used.

They’re apparently taking up slack from reduced Amtrak service, which I find odd. Why did Amtrak reduce their schedule if there is enough demand for Metro North to add trains?
The Empire Corridor service is facing two issues. One is the East River Tunnel construction. While the trains don't carry passengers through these tunnels, they use them to access Sunnyside Yard in Queens. Traditionally, the Empire trains were unidirectional, meaning they had to be turned around at each end of the trip. The only place to do that in NYC is Sunnyside Yard. Albany-Rensselaer has a wye junction for that. There are 4 tunnels, but only 3 will be available for the duration of the project, so schedules had to be reduced, and it was the non-revenue trips that got dropped first.

Amtrak mitigated this by operating most Empire trains as push/pull, by using depowered locomotives as cab control cars. This eliminates the need to turn the train around at the terminals. However, some trips must still use Sunnyside Yard, as they are stored there, and these were the ones that got dropped. The effect is that they dropped from 13 daily round trips to 10, but with the capacity of 11 due to the Maple Leaf and Adirondack operating combined south of Albany.

The other issue is that Amtrak is facing a severe equipment shortage, due to the premature retirement of several fleets, and just the aging nature of what is left. When the schedules were reduced, they were supposed to lengthen most of the remaining trains from 5 cars to 6 cars, but that never happened.

The result of this is that the trains sell out a lot quicker and charge much higher fares. It pissed a lot of people off, and the governor noticed. The response was to cap the Albany to New York fare at $99, restore one of the previously cancelled Amtrak trips, and add a new trip on Metro North. This works well because Metro North's schedules are very "peaky", meaning they run very frequent rush hour service, with much less frequent service at other times. So they have a lot of trains that sit in Grand Central all day until the evening rush. One of those can be sent to Albany and back in time for the evening rush, so it is essentially free equipment.

Was a bigger priority to NYS (and especially its political class, I assume) to maintain service so they figured out a way to run it on MetroNorth originating from Grand Central. Not clear from the press release how much this is gonna cost the state.
The Empire trains ran from Grand Central prior to 1991. They were moved to Penn Station to consolidate all intercity rail service there. They have temporarily operated from Grand Central on a few occasions since then, but did not in this situation because of Metro North's Park Avenue Viaduct project.

The Empire trains, while operated and branded as Amtrak, are not actually funded by Amtrak. New York State, through NYSDOT, pays Amtrak each year about $40M to both lease the equipment and operate the trains. NYSDOT could choose any operator for these trains though, so in this case, they looked to another state agency to do it. Because it is being paid for by NYSDOT, and not out of any MTA budget, it does not require expanding the Metropolitan Commuter Transportation District and its associated taxes to Columbia County and Rensselaer County (where the stations are). The trip is likely to be revenue-neutral as there is so much demand on the Albany-NYC route. As I mentioned earlier, it will use equipment that is normally sitting idle in Grand Central until the evening rush.

I'm not sure how the timetables compare. You can go NYC to Philly on commuter rail for a big discount compared to the Amtrak fare but it takes twice as long, at least (though that one requires a transfer).
Metro North equipment is slower than Amtrak equipment. The equipment that will be used on this service has a top speed of 90 mph, though only 80 mph is currently achieved on the line south of Poughkeepsie. The line has a 95 mph section between Poughkeepsie and Rhinecliff, and a 110 mph section between Hudson and Albany. The Metro North trip will for this reason be slightly slower. Also, Grand Central is a longer route with some slow curves, while the route to Penn Station is more direct. It is not always cheaper to do NYC to Philly on NJ Transit / Septa. Amtrak fares are very inconsistent however, as they use dynamic pricing and yield management, while commuter rail fares are flat based on distance traveled. However, commuter rail agencies do tend to have almost yearly fare increases, while Amtrak does not.
 
Great info Sno.

Traditionally, the Empire trains were unidirectional, meaning they had to be turned around at each end of the trip. The only place to do that in NYC is Sunnyside Yard. Albany-Rensselaer has a wye junction for that.
Do they still use turntables? There was one near where I live in Hopewell Junction and I’ve heard there was one up in the Catskills. I believe that one was in either Arkville or Margaritville.
 
Good stuff @snoloco (y)
Alway thought the “loco” was related to your great passion for skiing.
Loco's also short for locomotion.

Folks ran it for $1.50 from Schenectady to NC round trip during the depression.
 
Last edited:
Whatabout a bus?
I’ve ridden on a ski bus way more times than on a ski train.
Dang rowdy on the way with church mice quiet coming back.
 
Whatabout a bus?
I’ve ridden on a ski bus way more times than on a ski train.
Dang rowdy on the way with church mice quiet coming back.
Yes, bus trips exist to many ski resorts. Though since I don't live in NYC, I'm not really familiar with them.

Very expensive. Expect fares similar to if you took a taxi that far. It's more intended for the west when people are traveling to the ski resorts from the airport.

Do they still use turntables? There was one near where I live in Hopewell Junction and I’ve heard there was one up in the Catskills. I believe that one was in either Arkville or Margaritville.
Turntables are rarely used today. There are 3 common methods for turning a train around that isn't push/pull.

1. Loop track: This is most analogous to making a U-turn in your car. The train traverses a loop track and ends up facing the other direction. The main advantage is that it does not necessitate any backup moves (more on that later). Disadvantages are how much space loop tracks take up, and uneven wheel wear if loop tracks at either end turn the same direction (counterclockwise vs clockwise).

2. Wye junction: Think of this as making a 3-point turn in your car. The train pulls into the wye track, and is backed out the other direction, such that if faces opposite. So if the wye track runs east/west, and the train enters from the north, then it would reverse to exit to the south, and then be pulled forward, such that it faces the opposite way that it came in. The main advantage is that it takes up less space than a loop track. One disadvantage are that the train has to physically fit onto the wye track. If it doesn't, then sometimes only the locomotive needs to be turned around, but that adds another step to the process as it has to be must be decoupled and recoupled. Another disadvantage is that the reverse moves are done without a control stand on the end facing the direciton of travel. As such, the conductor has to stand there and guide the engineer, who can't see behind the train.

3. Run-Around: This necessitates decoupling the locomotive from the passenger cars, operating it down a different track, and then switching tracks and recoupling with the passenger cars. Advantages are that it takes up little room, and can be done relatively fast compared to the other methods. One drawback is the fact that it only works with locomotives that have two cabs, one on each end (like the Amtrak ACS-64). Another drawback is that two station tracks are needed. One to park the passenger cars, and another to run the locomotive around the train on. And lastly, whenever the locomotive is disconnected, passengers have no light or HVAC.
 
Last edited:
Folks ran it for $1.50 from Schenectady to NC round trip during the depression.
Sno trains made sense when Schenectady to North Creek was a 4 hour drive in a Model A that might not make it, or when it was an 8 hour train trip to spend a week in northern Vermont, but all that was a long time ago. Interstate highways and air travel killed all that.
Busses make more sense but even that is going away. The whole Epic/Ikon thing has split the market in half. It used to be you could fill a bus with 50 skiers who would go anywhere, now 25 will only go Epic, and the rest want to go Ikon. Also mountains aren't offering cheap group tickets much anymore, and some are refusing to allow busses on the property at all.

mm
 
Back
Top