. IMO it's not equitable that hikers use the trails for free while sportsmen and women, as well as anyone owning a snowmobile off road motorcycle or atv must pay a fee.
In general, I don’t think anyone should have to pay fees to use public land. When there is “stuff” on that land (state-run golf courses, ski areas, beach facilities, national park infrastructure, etc.) then I think they should charge enough money to cover their cost of operations (or less than cost, because I like the idea that the government just subsidizes fun stuff for its citizenry. This is my “Parks should be free, we pay taxes” argument).
I guess hiking trails that require maintenance can be considered “stuff”, so I suppose they could have a “hiking license” that covers the cost of forest rangers, rescues, etc. I’d imagine the cost would be similar to hunting or fishing licenses.
I think the goal of people who care about lands should encourage more people to get outdoors, not less. I do think that if we start attaching fees (license fees, parking fees, etc.) & barriers to entry, we will get less people using the lands, which isn’t good, IMO. I do think that’s the goal of a lot of the people here (to get less people to use certain trails), and for areas along Route 73, I definitely understand that sentiment.
The solution for me is that I just use trails at different times than the masses (evenings, weekdays) and go to slightly out-of-the-way places that the masses don’t go (west of Saranac Lake was fine last year)